Skip to main content

Dear Taylor Swift, we’re sorry about those explicit deepfakes

This story originally appeared in The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter on AI. To get stories like this in your inbox first, sign up here.

Hi, Taylor.

I can only imagine how you must be feeling after sexually explicit deepfake videos of you went viral on X. Disgusted. Distressed, perhaps. Humiliated, even. 

I’m really sorry this is happening to you. Nobody deserves to have their image exploited like that. But if you aren’t already, I’m asking you to be furious. 

Furious that this is happening to you and so many other women and marginalized people around the world. Furious that our current laws are woefully inept at protecting us from violations like this. Furious that men (because let’s face it, it’s mostly men doing this) can violate us in such an intimate way and walk away unscathed and unidentified. Furious that the companies that enable this material to be created and shared widely face no consequences either, and can profit off such a horrendous use of their technology. 

Deepfake porn has been around for years, but its latest incarnation is its worst one yet. Generative AI has made it ridiculously easy and cheap to create realistic deepfakes. And nearly all deepfakes are made for porn. Only one image plucked off social media is enough to generate something passable. Anyone who has ever posted or had a photo published of them online is a sitting duck. 

First, the bad news. At the moment, we have no good ways to fight this. I just published a story looking at three ways we can combat nonconsensual deepfake porn, which include watermarks and data-poisoning tools. But the reality is that there is no neat technical fix for this problem. The fixes we do have are still experimental and haven’t been adopted widely by the tech sector, which limits their power. 

The tech sector has thus far been unwilling or unmotivated to make changes that would prevent such material from being created with their tools or shared on their platforms. That is why we need regulation. 

People with power, like yourself, can fight with money and lawyers. But low-income women, women of color, women fleeing abusive partners, women journalists, and even children are all seeing their likeness stolen and pornified, with no way to seek justice or support. Any one of your fans could be hurt by this development. 

The good news is that the fact that this happened to you means politicians in the US are listening. You have a rare opportunity, and momentum, to push through real, actionable change. 

I know you fight for what is right and aren’t afraid to speak up when you see injustice. There will be intense lobbying against any rules that would affect tech companies. But you have a platform and the power to convince lawmakers across the board that rules to combat these sorts of deepfakes are a necessity. Tech companies and politicians need to know that the days of dithering are over. The people creating these deepfakes need to be held accountable. 

You once caused an actual earthquake. Winning the fight against nonconsensual deepfakes would have an even more earth-shaking impact.



from MIT Technology Review https://ift.tt/mJBFG1x
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Roundtables: Unveiling the 10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2025

Recorded on January 3, 202 5 Unveiling the 10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2025 Speakers: Amy Nordrum , executive editor, and Charlotte Jee , news editor. Each year, MIT Technology Review publishes an annual list of the top ten breakthrough technologies that will have the greatest impact on how we live and work in the future. This year, the 10 Breakthrough Technologies list was unveiled live by our editors. Hear from  MIT Technology Review  executive editor Amy Nordrum and news editor Charlotte Jee as they share an unveiling of the list of the 10 breakthrough technologies. Related Coverage The 10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2025 3 things that didn’t make the 10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2025 list The 10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2024 from MIT Technology Review https://ift.tt/0Xert49 via IFTTT

Why scientists want to help plants capture more carbon dioxide

This article is from The Spark, MIT Technology Review’s weekly climate newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Wednesday,  sign up here. Hello hello!  This week in The Spark, we’re taking a look back at one of my favorite sessions from our ClimateTech conference last week, from a chapter we called “Cleaning Your Plate.”  In the session, I sat down with Pamela Ronald, a plant geneticist at the University of California, Davis. She’s been working for years on helping rice survive floods, and now she’s turning her attention to using advanced genetics for carbon removal on farmland.  Genetics and plants Scientists have a wide range of tools at their disposal to influence how plants grow. From standard genetic engineering to more sophisticated gene editing tools like CRISPR, we have more power than ever to influence what traits we want in crops.  But genetic tweaking isn’t anything new. “Virtually everything we eat has been improved using some sort o...

The Animation Guild ratifies a contract with big studios, without AI demands such as letting members opt out of using AI or having AI train on their work (Gene Maddaus/Variety)

Gene Maddaus / Variety : The Animation Guild ratifies a contract with big studios, without AI demands such as letting members opt out of using AI or having AI train on their work   —  The Animation Guild has ratified its contract with the major studios, despite concerns from some about protections against artificial intelligence. from Techmeme https://ift.tt/4pCbZY7 via IFTTT